[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] A short list of things
From: |
James Spencer |
Subject: |
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] A short list of things |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:57:02 -0500 |
>
> So the mermen would be split internally between 2 factions? I find that
> a bit odd. But it might just be the novelty of the idea.
>
> /Sanna
>
>
It should be less odd than is the case with Mages (Grr! We read the
same books, now die) or Nagas... They are both same race / same type
split between two races...
Since I've talked to turin & he's OK with changing his merfolk / nagas
I'll go ahead & do that for his campaign, and the others, and notify
the others via PM.
Any other thoughts on this:
>b) What should be done in MP? I have this pet theory about what I'd like:
>- Give the Loyalists the Merman Fighter line. I know we've invested a
>certain amount of effort in justifying why they have the Naga, and I
>wouldn't contradict that in public, but why?
>- Give the Rebels the Merman Hunter line INSTEAD of the Merman Fighter
>line. I think this line has more of an Elven affinity than the fighter
>line, it would reduce unit duplication between the factions, and it
>would give the unit a use withing the game. Another option I'm less
>fond of would be to give the Rebels the Mermaids. A water based magic
>user would certainly give them a perceived power boost... This is an
>either or thing (IMHO) and I like the idea of using the Hunter line
>more.
>- Give the Northerners the new Nagas...
Also (In a hijack of my own thread):
Does anybody mind if I give the 'Drake Slasker' defense_weight=1.10 on
his firststrike spear? This is just enough to tip the balance into him
using it on defence when there is no difference between a pierce and
slash attack...