Re: [Adonthell-devel] Rewriting C++ base code

[Kai Sterker]

Am Freitag, 25.07.03 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Courbot:

> By the way. It may be a good idea to think about how we are going to 
> organize
> the integration of the dialog system into 0.4 and where we will put 
> dlgedit.
>
> All of our tools should have a CVS module of their own IMO. They would 
> require
> the engine to be installed of course, and would link to the needed 
> libs.

We've already talked about that briefly, didn't we? I too think, the 
tools should get their 'tools' module, as they're not strictly needed 
for most people. As you further say, they'd depend on the adonthell 
package, of course, and link to those libs they require.


> This doesn't settle the problem of knowing where we will put the dialog
> engine. It will rely on the base and python modules only, right? Maybe 
> it
> would have its place with the RPG stuff like characters and objects 
> handling,
> since they are going to use python as well. Which name should this 
> module
> have is still unknown to me, however.

I would say so. Why not simply have a lib called 'libadonthell_rpg'? 
We'd put character and quest stuff there, as well as items, inventory 
and combat code. And the dialog engine. After all, that also depends on 
characters, so it would make sense to have it in the same lib.

How does that sound?

Kai