Re: Paragraph indentation suppression

[Simon Law]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 09:47:51AM -0400, Karl Berry wrote:
>     2. Save \parindent and set it to 0pt
> 
> It seems less invasive to me to have \everypar use \kern-\parindent than
> to save and restore it.  More robust in the face of something else
> tinkering with \parindent in the meantime.

        Yes, that is a better method.

>       Thanks for respecting my X-No-Cc: and Mail-Followup-To: headers.
> 
> Well, I removed you "by hand" from the To: address this time, but if you
> want this to be effective, you'll have to get MUA authors to pay
> attention to x-no-cc (good luck).  Usually I simply do reply in VM.  I
> can't keep track of who is or isn't on any given mailing list any more.
> 
> Another option would be to dynamically set Reply-To: to the list name?!

        Actually, Mail-Followup-To: is respected by such MUAs as Mutt,
Gnus and nmh.  I'm not sure how to convince VM to respect it, though.
I believe there's an XEmacs patch called patch-keywords.el, but I
haven't looked hard at it.

        Setting Reply-To: is fairly harmful.  See [1].

Simon

[1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html