[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make dist fixes
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: make dist fixes |
Date: |
08 Feb 2002 19:51:51 -0700 |
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> writes:
Mark> That (and the example) seems to make sense. But it also means
Mark> that we don't have one bug in jikes, but two bugs, one in ORP
Mark> and one in gcj byte code generation. Sigh.
If you have the time, would you mind constructing a test case so we
can see if gij also has the runtime bug? I'd appreciate that.
Tom
- Re: make dist fixes, (continued)
- Re: make dist fixes, Brian Jones, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Eric Blake, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Eric Blake, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes, Tom Tromey, 2002/02/08
- Re: make dist fixes,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: make dist fixes, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/08
- Crash in java_lang_Double.c with kissme, John Leuner, 2002/02/09
- Re: Crash in java_lang_Double.c with kissme, Brian Jones, 2002/02/09
- Re: Crash in java_lang_Double.c with kissme, John Leuner, 2002/02/09