Re: Concern about new binding.

[Gregory Heytings]

> > > I'd prefer to find a binding to which people could agree, because that 
> > > would leave fewer people unhappy.  The two candidates proposed till 
> > > now are "C-x G" and "C-x M-u".
> >
> > You forgot the proposal to which the mail you are replying to 
> > explicitly refers.
>
> No, I didn't forget.  I just prefer to solve a problem by the simplest 
> fix, and introducing a whole new set of bindings seems more complex than 
> strictly needed.

The proposal is only to use "C-x g r" for "revert-buffer" and C-x g R" for 
"revert-buffer-with-fine-grain", leaving room for other buffer-related 
operations.  These bindings are also hard to type by accident.

The other proposed bindings are there only to demonstrate that the keymap 
would not remain empty.