Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key and reserve it for third-party packages

[Gregory Heytings]

> > I _kind of_ like this general idea because the current situation is 
> > getting kind of hazardous. _But_ if any of these do happen, make sure 
> > the symbol for the sub-keymap is exposed so the user can move the whole 
> > thing somewhere else from init code.
>
> Yes, focusing on the keymap first and presuming that its actual binding 
> may change seems important.  Tho in practice, when a keymap is bound 
> changes which bindings inside the map are convenient to type: E.g. `C-z 
> C-z` is much easier to type than `M-o C-z`.

And in practice, too, there is no chance third-party library developers 
would agree to use that keymap if it is not bound by default to a sensible 
key.  It must be an appealing solution.