Re: Suggested experimental test

[Gregory Heytings]

> > Well... the suggested experiment does not remove C-o, it changes C-o in 
> > a way that is, I believe, painless.
>
> Sorry; I didn't read the patch carefully.  So it basically moves `C-o' 
> to `C-o C-o' (and makes the `C-o' prefix open for new commands)?

Yes and yes.

> I don't use `C-o' myself, so I can't really say to what degree this 
> would be annoying or not for users.  Any `C-o' users who have an opinion 
> here?

I think we won't really know without experimenting.