Re: Not able to display \u110BD and \u110CD in Emacs

[समीर सिंह Sameer Singh]

It is strange that I seem to be unable to find such rules anywhere on
the Internet, not just in the Unicode Standard text.

I was not able to find the rules, but they definitely exist.

http://वेद.com/en/rigveda/1/38/3

http://वेद.com/en/rigveda/1/34/9

http://वेद.com/en/rigveda/1/48/6

On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 7:53 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 19:49:20 +0530 (IST)
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Madhu <enometh@meer.net>
>
> *  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> <83h761zv0w.fsf@gnu.org" target="_blank">83h761zv0w.fsf@gnu.org>
> Wrote on Sat, 07 May 2022 10:01:03 +0300
>
> >> From: Madhu <enometh@meer.net>
> >> Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 21:23:50 +0530
> >>
> >> The devanagari numerals 1 (#x967) & 3 (#x969) can be combined with
> >> the svarita (#x951, incorrectly named in unicode as DEVANAGARI
> >> STRESS SIGN UDATTA) and the anudatta (#x952) to form the 4 different
> >> accents.
> >>
> >> numeral one + anudatta + svarita
> >> preceding anudatta + numeral three + anudatta + svarita
> >> numeral one +  anudatta
> >> numeral three + anudatta + svarita
> >>
> >> e.g.  (#x969 #x951 #x952), when composed, the devanagari numeral 3
> >> should have an anudatta ("line below") and svarita ("vertical line
> >> above")
> >
> > Where are these rules documented?  I don't see them in the latest
> > Unicode Standard 14.0.
>
> I have no idea.  I assumed the rulesfollow from (some defined) rules
> for composition, but I stopped dealing with unicode for sanskrit (
> vedic accents) back in 2002 when I saw the direction it was going in.

It is strange that I seem to be unable to find such rules anywhere on
the Internet, not just in the Unicode Standard text.

rig-veda1.png
Description: PNG image

rig-veda3.png
Description: PNG image