[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode 15
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode 15 |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2022 21:27:38 +0300 |
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 23:03:16 +0530
> Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> No :/ is this related to mule-cmds.el? Because I did not update it, because I
> could not understand it
> for example why are some ranges commented out and some are missing.
mule-cmds.el needs to be updated only if ranges of codepoints marked
as "unused" have changed, so some of their codepoints are now used for
characters. The commented-out ranges are those whose names either
don't exist (because they are unused) or are meaningless, like those
in the various ideographic blocks.
Suppose you tell what exactly did you do with "C-x 8 RET" that didn't
work?
- Re: Unicode 15, (continued)
- Re: Unicode 15, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/14
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/14
- Re: Unicode 15, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, Robert Pluim, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, Robert Pluim, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/15
- Re: Unicode 15, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/09/16
- Re: Unicode 15, Robert Pluim, 2022/09/16
- Re: Unicode 15, Peter Oliver, 2022/09/16