Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help

[Matthew Linus Hannigan]

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:39:22AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>    > All of these are minor improvments, and nothing significant.  For
>    > tla you had `tla-fork', and `tla-switch'.
> 
>    No you didn't, they were NOT part of tla.
> 
> Not directly, but then, baz was never part of tla, 

never said they were

> so your point is
> completely moot, irrelevant, and you are looking for a flame.

This is so pot-calling-kettle stuff I think I've entered a disturbing new 
universe.

> If I add a new option, or an alias for a old one, that is not a

You've been told many times now that they were NOT a simple alias
or option, and they DID make a significant subjective difference
for many.  Including me.

> significant change.  That is the only change baz did, add some aliases
> or change the behaviour of a very small subset of options.  Such
> changes are not significant.  I find it amazing that some people here
> have such grave reading difficulties.

Choke

Go away silly person