[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:37:44 -0400 |
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:12:13 -0700 Jason wrote:
> In addition, the IRC channel and mailing lists mentioned on
> urukproject.org appear to be unavailable.
to be clear, that is part of the "actively maintained" criteria
- as those channels are the only contact information given on the
project website; this currently fails that criteria
just to note, this is another good example of why to avoid using
third-party services to host critical infra - the "actively
maintained" criteria considers communication to be critical -
o/c there is no criteria about using third-party services for
that, as long as users do not need to run non-free software to
communicate with the project - its just a very good idea
i see it as a natural corollary to software freedom; and that is
why i would prefer to hold the "complete distro" criteria to
it's strict interpretation - software users need to be able to
control their own computing - likewise, software projects need
to be able to control their own infrastructure, for all of the
same reasons
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] FSDG interpretations Was: review of uruk, (continued)
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/24
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, alimiracle, 2023/03/24
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/30
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/31
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Jean Louis, 2023/03/24