[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:29:01 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090812)

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <> wrote:

Groklaw's Pamela Jones, the Sarah Palin of the Software World is
at it again:

"The court quotes from Microsoft Corp. v. Software Wholesale
Club, Inc.: "the first-sale doctrine does not apply to an
admittedly counterfeit unit". So, no, you can't buy a copy and
use it to go into a counterfeiting business, in effect.
Terekhov's theory has bitten the dust and then had to eat some.
Just like Daniel Wallace's anti-GPL theory did. Whoever is
relying on their legal theories might want to buy a vowel and try
to figure this puzzle out."

[ and so on .. ]

Rjack, all this lot is pretty much off-topic here.  I think you'd
be better debating the matter on groklaw itself, which has an
active forum.

Yeah... an active forum and a black hole where reasonable disagreement
 is sent. Since when are GPL discussions "off topic" Lord Mackenzie?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]