Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions

[Carl Sorensen]

On 10/9/10 10:52 AM, "Joe Neeman" <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 10/9/10 9:46 AM, "Mark Polesky" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>>> * * * * * * * * * *
>>>> 
>>>> "before-title-spacing" applies to these cases:
>>>> 1) from last system in a score to top-level markup.
>>>> 2) from last system of one score to scoreTitleMarkup of
>>>>    another score.
>>>> 
>>>> Within the proposed naming scheme, the 2 choices for
>>>> before-title-spacing are:
>>>>   system-markup-spacing
>>>>   score-markup-spacing
>>>> 
>>>> Carl likes "score-markup-spacing" for at least 2 reasons:
>>>> 1) the upper attachment point is always the end of a score.
>>>> 2) "system-markup" suggests that it should work within a
>>>>    single score, and it doesn't.
>>>> 
>>>> I've gone back and forth, but now I'm in favor of
>>>> "system-markup-spacing" for the following reasons:
>>>> 1) it complements "markup-system-spacing" which is easier
>>>>    to remember.
>> 
>> I don't agree with this rationale.  markup-system-spacing is chosen
>> because the markup can be either inside the score of which the system
>> is a part
> 
> Really? How does that happen?

If the markup is a bookTitleMarkup or a top-level markup it's outside of the
score.

If it's a scoreTitleMarkup, it's inside of the score.

At least, this is the way that Mark identified it.

Thanks,

Carl

>