[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:03:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> 2011/2/7 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
>>
>> On 2/6/11 4:44 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> As for now, i've already reset my git repository (that is i clicked
>>> "Abort changes - reset to origin" in lily-git) and made the changes
>>> again. So now i call
>>>
>>> git status (everything looks fine, 3 files i've changed are listed)
>>> git diff HEAD (i see something resembling patch file)
>>> git commit -a (it asked me for message - i'm not sure if it's needed
>>> since it will be an update of existing commit, but i wrote something
>>> there and answered yes to questions that shown up...)
>>
>> There's no such thing as "an update of an existing commit". Every time you
>> do git commit, it's a new commit, even though it's an existing patch set.
>>
>> If you want to make it part of the previous commit, you can do so with
>> git commit -a --amend
>>
>> But I don't recommend doing that.
>
> Aha. Ok.
Rule of thumb: --amend is fine as long as long as the original commit
never got into any repository other than the one being amended.
A patchset on Rietveld does not count I should think since "commit" here
means a complete unit including author, committer, commit message, diff
and parent commit. Applying a patchset from Rietveld does not result in
a reliable reproduction of the "commit" as identified by git since
Rietveld is fundamentally Subversion.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/04
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/04
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/04
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/04
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/05
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/06
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/07
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/06
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/07
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/07
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/02/07
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Graham Percival, 2011/02/08
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/07
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Graham Percival, 2011/02/08
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/08
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Graham Percival, 2011/02/08
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/02/11
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/11
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/02/11
- Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed, Janek Warchoł, 2011/02/12