Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?

[Colin Hall]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:35:06PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> 
> Have you got the regtest comparison working?

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Hall"
> <address@hidden>
> To: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Lilypond Dev" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:30 PM
> Subject: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
> 
> 
> >
> >Graham,
> >
> >I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you
> >suggested uploading these to create an unofficial release.
> >
> >Still of interest?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Colin.
> >
> >[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-05/msg00446.html
> >
> 

How can I tell?

I have these (with directories beneath):

$ find gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/ -maxdepth 2 -type f -exec ls -lh \{\} \;
-rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 214 2012-06-02 08:58 
gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/index.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 4.4M 2012-06-02 08:58 
gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/compare-v2.15.38-1/index.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 349K 2012-06-02 08:58 
gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/compare-v2.15.38-1/index.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 67K 2012-06-02 08:58 
gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/compare-v2.15.38-1/changed.txt
$

Cheers,
Colin.

-- 

Colin Hall