Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?

[Colin Hall]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:55:20PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:44:53PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:30:18PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you suggested 
> > > > uploading these to create an unofficial release.
> > > > 
> > > > Still of interest?
> > > 
> > > As a general note, yes.  Right at the moment with 2.16 hopefully
> > > in three days, I think it would only create confusion to advertize
> > > an unofficial release.
> > 
> > Fine, that was the response I expected.
> 
> release countdown is cancelled due to
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2397
> so if you've got some server space, an unofficial release would be
> great.

See:

http://www.charltonhall.eclipse.co.uk/

That's the space I get with my ISP account so bandwidth (cost) might
be an issue. Would be nice if someone could mirror it so somewhere
more robust/cheaper.

> If you renamed the
> binaries before uploading them to your server -- something like
>   lilypond-2.15.39-colin-1.linux-x86.sh

Done.

Cheers,
Colin.

-- 

Colin Hall