[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant? |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:00:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:50:03PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> Hmm. I get "no previous results to compare with". Could you let me
> know exactly what you've got in your gub/regtests directory, please?
address@hidden:~/src/gub (master)$ pwd
/home/gperciva/src/gub
address@hidden:~/src/gub (master)$ ls regtests/
ignore lilypond-2.15.39-1.test-output.tar.bz2
address@hidden:~/src/gub (master)$
(when I built the 2.15.39 release, I had .38-1 in that dir and not
.39-1)
- Graham
- GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02