[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant? |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:37:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
>> See:
>>
>> http://www.charltonhall.eclipse.co.uk/
>>
>> That's the space I get with my ISP account so bandwidth (cost) might
>> be an issue. Would be nice if someone could mirror it so somewhere
>> more robust/cheaper.
>
> Ok. Alternately, you could only put up a few binaries (say,
> darwin-x86, mingw, linux-x86, and linux-64). Also, advertizing it
> on lilypond-user as unofficial binaries will probably get you
> between 10 and 100 downloads in total.
Are you also counting the web crawlers picking this up from the web
presentations of the mailing lists?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, (continued)
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02