[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant? |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:29:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> See:
>
> http://www.charltonhall.eclipse.co.uk/
>
> That's the space I get with my ISP account so bandwidth (cost) might
> be an issue. Would be nice if someone could mirror it so somewhere
> more robust/cheaper.
Ok. Alternately, you could only put up a few binaries (say,
darwin-x86, mingw, linux-x86, and linux-64). Also, advertizing it
on lilypond-user as unofficial binaries will probably get you
between 10 and 100 downloads in total. At 20 megs each, that's an
(estimated) maximum of 2 GB bandwidth. That's probably ok for a
residential ISP, but you may want to double-check.
If anybody else wants to chime in and offer hosting, of course
that would be quite appreciated.
- Graham
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, (continued)
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02