Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin Hall" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Colin Hall" <address@hidden>; "Graham Percival" 
<address@hidden>; "Lilypond Dev" <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?


> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:35:06PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > Have you got the regtest comparison working?
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Hall"
> > <address@hidden>
> > To: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
> > Cc: "Lilypond Dev" <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:30 PM
> > Subject: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
> >
> >
> > >
> > >Graham,
> > >
> > >I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you
> > >suggested uploading these to create an unofficial release.
> > >
> > >Still of interest?
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >Colin.
> > >
> > >[1] 
> > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-05/msg00446.html
> > >
>
> How can I tell?
>
> I have these (with directories beneath):
>
> $ find gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/ -maxdepth 2 -type f -exec ls -lh 
> \{\} \;
> -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 214 2012-06-02 08:58 
> gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/index.html
> -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 4.4M 2012-06-02 08:58 
> gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/compare-v2.15.38-1/index.html
> -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 349K 2012-06-02 08:58 
> gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/compare-v2.15.38-1/index.txt
> -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 67K 2012-06-02 08:58 
> gub/uploads/webtest/v2.15.39-2/compare-v2.15.38-1/changed.txt
> $


Try opening the html files in Firefox and see what you have.

--
Phil Holmes