[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:59:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:22:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Here's the first "main" policy point in GOP 2. For those
>> > unfamiliar with GOP, here's a quick summary:
>>
>> make a diff between releases 11.2 let’s not bother; interested
>> parties can make a diff themselves from git.
>>
>> Really? git can produce diffs between developer trees, not between
>> release tarballs.
>
> Can't it make a diff between tags? We always have tags for
> releases (unless that broke sometime recently).
>
>> Rolling several source releases and diffing them
>> seems like considerable work to me. While I lean towards "don't bother"
>> as well, the reasoning seems shaky at best.
>
> Hmm, I may have misunderstood your comment. If my response about
> tags doesn't actually answer your concern, please elaborate.
A source tarball is not the same as a snapshot of the git tree, is it?
--
David Kastrup
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Janek Warchoł, 2012/06/19
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/19