[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:05:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:59:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hmm, I may have misunderstood your comment. If my response about
> > tags doesn't actually answer your concern, please elaborate.
>
> A source tarball is not the same as a snapshot of the git tree, is it?
I see your point.
My understanding is that the source tarball is a snapshot of the
git tree, plus auto-generated files such as INSTALL.txt which are
generated solely from the snapshot of the git tree. If that
understanding is correct, then I would feel comfortable arguing
that a diff between git tags is sufficient to "represent" a diff
between source tarballs.
My understanding of the GNU policy is that this is a
recommendation, a "it would be nice for some users if you did
XYZ", rather than a requirement. In the age of git and
git-snapshot-tarballs and the like, I think this recommendation is
less valuable than it was ten years ago. However, I could be
mistaken.
- Graham
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Janek Warchoł, 2012/06/19
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/19
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/06/19