|
From: | Lewis ANESA |
Subject: | Re: [task #16044] Submission of Ladspa Tool Kit |
Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:09:31 +0200 |
Hi Ineiev, all,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:53 AM Ineiev <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Follow-up Comment #7, task #16044 (project administration):
>
> [comment #6 comment #6:]
> > >What were you advised?
> ...
> > So I put myself (My own name) on copyright. (file #51945)
>
> Was that correct?
I think it is. The submitter is claiming copyright for files they
authored. Meanwhile, FSF has not (yet) accepted copyright for this
work.
The approach of submitting first to non-gnu svh then pursuing transfer
of copyright to FSF was from jxself in #fsf and confirmed rwp in
#savannah (on libera.chat). As an aside, were we also told that
transfer of copyright to FSF isn't a requirement for a package to
become a "GNU package".
My understanding is the author has this vision:
- package is accepted for non-GNU savannah
- package is accepted as an official GNU package and thus moves to GNU savannah
- transfer of copyright to FSF (if desired by FSF/GNU teams)
Louis, please correct any part of this that appears incorrect.
TIA for your guidance Ineiev
--
Corwin
corwin@bru.st
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |