[task #16044] Submission of Ladspa Tool Kit

[Lewis ANESA]

Follow-up Comment #12, task #16044 (project administration):

> Err... we were speaking about copyright...
Sorry, I got confused, yes, I'm ok with the copyright.

> LGPL?
No, sorry I didn't use LGPL, nowhere, never.

> Well, you'll be able to claim...
> Can you check the license...
Ok, I spent that last days to better understand what
GNU GPLv3 automatically propagates to any software
by depending to an already covered piece of code.

That is fundamentally different with what I understood at the first time, ok.
That better protect what the project than what I expected, so that's still ok
for me.

> Or because English isn't my native language...
May you let me know your native language?

So this raises a new question and I searched answers but I didn't seen any yet
:
If I sell an embedded system which carry GPLv3 software,
will I have to release electronic schematic under GPLv3 too?

Best regards and thanks a lot for your patience.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16044>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.nongnu.org/