[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Re: Confused on 'Classic'
From: |
Yann Dirson |
Subject: |
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Re: Confused on 'Classic' |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:04:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:41:49PM -0500, James Spencer wrote:
> In my own mind my definition of 'classic' was:
> "Racially pure factions + the capability to cross deep water (or not,
> for the sake of consistency)." But I was wrong as pointed out by the
> various replies... But now I know :)
I do agree to the "Racially pure factions" idea for classic. But
maybe we could have 2 flavours of a classic era, with and without
water crossing. But starting along this path may lead us to too wide
a selection of eras. Maybe we should allow to setup and save custom
eras ?
--
Yann Dirson <address@hidden> |
Debian-related: <address@hidden> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>