[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:36:31 -0500 |
In lists.arch.users, Dustin wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2003, at 3:50 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
>> You've posted this same silly rant about five times now, please give it
>> a (longer) rest.
>
> Is this really the best answer one can expect from this list?
> Honestly, I made a suggestion I believe might improve tla, gave both
> reasons and examples for that position, and this is all you have to
> offer? Are you really incapable of saying anything more than ``No it's
> not'' and insulting my ideas?
Dustin, what did you expect?
You've brought the subject up several times and failed to reach any sort
of consensus each time. I agree with Miles that if your suggestions were
worthwile they would have found traction long ago.
I happen to like what command aliases give us. They give us the ability
to change the name of commands yet leave the original command name
available for a period of time while the public adjusts.
At this point, since you've failed to reach a concensus, you have the
following choices:
1. You can privately fork tla and remove the aliases by editing
src/libarch/cmds.c.
2. You can make a shell wrapper. This untested wrapper would probably do
what you want.
#!/bin/sh
# Rename tla to tla.real and rename this to tla
case "$1" in
help)
tla.real $* | grep -v alias
;;
*)
tla $*
;;
esac
3. You can live with it, and let people worry about more important
issues.
4. You can continue to try and push the issue. However, if you do this,
I'm willing to bet that you'll end up killfiled by so many people
that your opinion on other, more important, issues will cease to
exist.
In summation, tla is not generically broken because what you want hasn't
occurred. At *best* tla is broken for you specifically.
Happy holidays,
James
--
James Blackwell Using I.T. to bring more 570-407-0488
Owner, Inframix business to your business http://inframix.com
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Mark Thomas, 2003/12/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Mark Thomas, 2003/12/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Mark Thomas, 2003/12/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Miles Bader, 2003/12/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Miles Bader, 2003/12/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands,
James Blackwell <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, James Blackwell, 2003/12/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Tom Lord, 2003/12/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/15