[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regarding LSR translation work
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Regarding LSR translation work |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:25:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:04:57AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 21/04/2012 13:09, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> >Because snippets come from LSR, and that needs a texidoc to
> >display some text for the snippet.
>
> So it seems that there are only two possible solutions (I'm just
> daydreaming):
>
> 1) manage all the docs snippets in Git and say hello to LSR (see
> bottom of my email)
Do you mean "goodbye" instead of "hello" ?
> 2) ask the LSR author to add the possibility to insert translated
> titles and descriptions (the website itself could benefit from this,
> since it may enable language negotiation). But managing the updates
> may be a problem..
You'd be asking him to do about 30 hours of unpaid work.
> >I really don't see any way to rescue the snippet system. It was a
> >gamble that hasn't paid off; it was supposed to be a standalone
>
> Since the gamble hasn't paid off (i.e. it didn't encourage
> *potential contributors*), why keeping this structure that is really
> annoying current translators (i.e. *real contributors*)?
Because any change involves work.
> Personally, I'm a bit worried about going on with translating NR
> when I know that keeping it up-to-date will be an hassle.
>
> Let's manage all the doc snippets in Git and say hello to LSR import!
> Which are the arguments against this change?
It involves work. In particular, horrible build system work,
which always takes an order of magnitude longer than you might
expect.
Any non-trivial change to the current system will take a minimum
of 10 hours of work, and I would not be the slightest bit
surprised if it ends up taking 50 hours. Are *you* offering to do
all that work? To spend 50 hours, and at the end of all that
work, have the documentation look exactly the same as it does
right now?
I don't see this as a wise investment right now. We have much
more urgent problems to tackle. And even if we didn't, I think we
could get better "bang for our buck" by putting that amount of
energy a different direction. Organizing ly/, organizing the
regtests, make Patchy handle automatic countdowns, maybe start
GLISS...? there's a *ton* of great projects which would be less
work and would produce better rewards.
- Graham
- Regarding LSR translation work, Francisco Vila, 2012/04/17
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/04/17
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Federico Bruni, 2012/04/17
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Francisco Vila, 2012/04/17
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Federico Bruni, 2012/04/21
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/04/21
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, James, 2012/04/21
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Graham Percival, 2012/04/21
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Federico Bruni, 2012/04/23
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Carl Sorensen, 2012/04/23
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Federico Bruni, 2012/04/24
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Federico Bruni, 2012/04/24
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/24
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Graham Percival, 2012/04/25
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/24
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Graham Percival, 2012/04/24
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Francisco Vila, 2012/04/24
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Francisco Vila, 2012/04/24
- Re: Regarding LSR translation work, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/24