monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] any more 0.26 blockers?


From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] any more 0.26 blockers?
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:19:12 +0200 (CEST)

[My mail server crashed today, for obscure reasons, and it seems like
I lost a bunch of mails, both going in and out, and judging from the
monotone-devel archive, it looks like this didn't go out.  Appologies
if you get a double]

In message <address@hidden> on Sat, 8 Apr 2006 13:54:17 -0400, address@hidden 
said:

hendrik> I notice that there is a Debian packages for 0.24 in both sid
hendrik> and etch.  But that, I gather, is major changes before 0.26.

I'm currently in conversation with the Debian developpers mailing
list, and they're trying to get hold of the maintainer, who basically
hasn't responded to anything since somewhere in January, I think, at
least as far as I've been able to figure out.

Right now, it's a bit of "let's see if he shows a sign of life at all
and take it from there".  We can only wait and see.  He might be
through some big changes in life, he may be severely sick, or just on
extended vacation.  I think the Debian organization will reach a point
when the monotone package will reach of state of lack of maintainer,
and that will be the point when a new maintainer will have to step up.

I'm keeping an eye on what's happening.  As a Debian and monotone
user, I've quite a bit of interest in this.

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]