[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width
From: |
Martin Samuelsson |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:06:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 05:01:28PM -0400, Shawn Betts wrote:
> Second, here's a possible solution:
Some people sure have and should have a better understanding of
ratpoison than me. Sorry I said it couldn't be done. From now on I'll
spend 20 hours a day just reading the source and learn, starting this
week!
> if [ x$CUR = 'x*,XTerm' ]; then
> $RATPOISON -c "defpadding 0 0 100 0"
> else
> $RATPOISON -c "defpadding 0 0 0 0"
> fi
One question/comment here.
Wouldn't it be more sane to use "set padding 0 0 100 0"? Isn't those
defcommands supposed to be removed once version 2.0 (or whatever) is
released? Or have I misunderstood that?
--
/Martin
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, (continued)
Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Kevin Geiss, 2005/04/06
Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/06
Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Shawn Betts, 2005/04/09
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/09
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width,
Martin Samuelsson <=
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Shawn Betts, 2005/04/12
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/12
- The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Martin Samuelsson, 2005/04/12
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Shawn Betts, 2005/04/17
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/17
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Martin Samuelsson, 2005/04/19
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/19