[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width
From: |
Nikolai Weibull |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:05:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.8i |
Shawn Betts, April 12:
> I think the def* commands should stay around for compatibility with
> screen (though it grows less and less compatible). Is there a reason
> to remove them?
That they're butt-ugly? I wish screen(1) had been written with more
forethought. Seriously, though, I guess there's no real harm in having
them around,
nikolai
--
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, (continued)
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Shawn Betts, 2005/04/09
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/09
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Martin Samuelsson, 2005/04/11
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width, Shawn Betts, 2005/04/12
- Re: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width,
Nikolai Weibull <=
- The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Martin Samuelsson, 2005/04/12
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Shawn Betts, 2005/04/17
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/17
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Martin Samuelsson, 2005/04/19
- Re: The def* commands (Was: [RP] Getting Through and Locking XTerm Width), Nikolai Weibull, 2005/04/19