[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 03:59:52 -0800 (PST) |
--- Tim Perdue <address@hidden> wrote:
> James, you are not involved in the GForge project and have not
> committed
> even one line of code to the project, as far as I know.
I have been invited into the project, and made a member. The first
thing that I did was review the source code and found these problems.
This is not a company, you are not the boss. I respect your decision,
but you really have to read the gpl. As a receipient of code from you
that may be in violation of the gpl, i have the moral responsibility to
point this out.
>You are not
> "in
> the loop", nor do you have any reason to be.
You wish! In what dreamland are you living in?
I am in the loop big time!
It seems to me that you still have not understood how the GPL works :
As soon as you release source code to the public, we become receipients
of that, and are bound to it when we redistribute it or create derived
works.
Savannah is therefore responsible to remove any license violations
instead of redistributing them.
Dont make them do that.
Maybe you need some help here :
I offer to you to review every single commit of yours for possible
license violations. Would that help?
> This is exactly what was done. I have not placed my code in CVS, nor
> shown it to anyone. I have not even had time to debug it because I am
> busy on other things. I have merely placed a screenshot of it online
> and
> get attacked by you and a couple other people.
Noone is attacking you. You are getting personal, I have nothing
against you at all. I have lots of respect for what you have done and
intend on creating a derived work from it. In order for me to do so,
I need to make sure that the code is under the GPL, and that you have
no possible license violations.
That is my responsibilty as a free software developer.
Otherwise, I run the risk of violating the GPL by making a derived work
of a program that is already in violation.
I pointed out the mixing of licensing is a problem, it still is not
resolved :
please fix it :
http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gforge/gforge/lgpl/lgplpre.php?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup`
1. - no copyright holder information
2. - first sentence that leads to think it's possible to link
non-free to gforge, which is wrong until a line of GPLd
code remains in gforge
<?php /** * lgplpre.php - allows non-free software to be linked
safely to GForge * * This file is part of GForge. * * GForge is
free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the
terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by *
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or *
(at
your option) any later version. * * GForge is distributed in the
hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without
even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU Lesser General Public License
for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU
Lesser General Public License * along with GForge; if not, write to
the
Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330,
oston, MA 02111-1307 US */
> Today I have pulled it all down and have no intention of releasing it
> under GPL. I've thought about deleting it and saying "piss on it".
What are you talking about, your code? As I said, I fully support the
creating of Ransom code, and if you have the money to do the research
into the GPL question, please do so.
I am not a lawer, and I can only suggest that you stick to one license.
Dont mix them. If you want a new license, talk to a laywer. If you want
to make a LGPLEd project, start one.
Please to do not add LGPLed code to gforge.
If you have a solution to the issue of the GPL and the usage of the
database tables, please let me know, I am very interested in this.
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
- Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, (continued)
- Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tim Perdue, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Mathieu Roy, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tim Perdue, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Mathieu Roy, 2003/02/12
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Dan Kuykendall, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tim Perdue, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Dan Kuykendall, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tim Perdue, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge,
James Michael DuPont <=
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Julien Goodwin, 2003/02/13
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tim Perdue, 2003/02/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/14
- RE: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tom Copeland, 2003/02/14
- RE: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/14
- RE: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tom Copeland, 2003/02/14
- RE: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tom Copeland, 2003/02/14
- RE: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/14
RE: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge, Tom Copeland, 2003/02/14