gforge-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge


From: Tim Perdue
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: [Gforge-devel] gforge
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:24:37 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210

James Michael DuPont wrote:

The subset that he shows is the session, the database connection and
the  database structure via the connection. All of these are created by
GPLed code and stored in memory.

According to you, typing "psql gforge" at the command line is a GPL violation. That's absurd. The database is not GPL. If fanatics are trying to claim that all corporate data is now GPL, then all companies should immediately abandon this poison license and stay as far away as possible.

Under your fanatic interpretation, the SOAP server is also useless to us, and everything that sends/receives SOAP must also be released under GPL.

Clearly this poison license is a problem for future versions. We can't have companies being attacked by fanatics. They need to be able to use GForge in confidence.

Tim





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]