Re: DOCS: include a sample "Makefile"?

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:56:07PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> What do you guys think of including a sample Makefile somewhere in the  
> documentation?

I've been wanting this since before GDP.

> I've looked at Nicolas Sceaux's  
> makefile for his operas, and at the GNUMakefile in the LP documentation,  
> but they're so complex that I couldn't use them as models for my own.

I would expect that most of that complexity can be removed due to
the new relative \include paths.

> My initial thought is to put the sample makefile in either 1)  
> application usage, where it gives the lilypond-book commands, or 2) LM  
> "handling large projects."

AU is slated for demolishment, but there's nothing wrong with
dumping it there as a quick fix; then we'll have the material
available when we move to the next thing.  LM 5 was never
finished, so there's also nothing wrong with dumping it there as a
quick fix.

Cheers,
- Graham