lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)


From: James
Subject: Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:43:39 +0100

Mike,

On 26 April 2012 08:51, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 07:55, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, right now we have nobody running the automated tests to
>>>> check that new patches are ok.  So there will be no patches
>>>> accepted to lilypond.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have a meeting in mid-May w/ the University of Paris VIII.  They're 
>>> donating a computer to LilyPond and I'll set patchy up on it.
>>>
>>
>
> One thing I'm gonna try to do on that machine is have each index.html 
> generated by a regtest comparison (along with the log/png/jpg/etc files) 
> upload to a folder on mikesolomon.org.  These can hang out indefinitely and 
> an automatic e-mail can be sent to the list w/ an alert that patchset X is up 
> for viewing on site Y.

Still requires 'someone' to 'do' something and then say 'LGTM' and I
don't know what the feed back has been with regard to the

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/grand-regression-test-checking.html

is this just not the same thing in essence?


What about GUB?

Might that be a (more) worthwhile 'project' for a machine like this?

I've never tried to use GUB myself, but it seems to be something we
could perhaps run nightly builds on.

James



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]