lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)


From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:41:03 +0200

On 26 avr. 2012, at 11:43, James wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> On 26 April 2012 08:51, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> On 26 April 2012 07:55, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, right now we have nobody running the automated tests to
>>>>> check that new patches are ok.  So there will be no patches
>>>>> accepted to lilypond.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I have a meeting in mid-May w/ the University of Paris VIII.  They're 
>>>> donating a computer to LilyPond and I'll set patchy up on it.
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> One thing I'm gonna try to do on that machine is have each index.html 
>> generated by a regtest comparison (along with the log/png/jpg/etc files) 
>> upload to a folder on mikesolomon.org.  These can hang out indefinitely and 
>> an automatic e-mail can be sent to the list w/ an alert that patchset X is 
>> up for viewing on site Y.
> 
> Still requires 'someone' to 'do' something and then say 'LGTM' and I
> don't know what the feed back has been with regard to the
> 
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/grand-regression-test-checking.html
> 
> is this just not the same thing in essence?
> 
> 
> What about GUB?
> 
> Might that be a (more) worthwhile 'project' for a machine like this?
> 

It's not not possible - it's not what I had in mind, but it sounds like a good 
idea.
I'll likely be spending a few days in July getting this thing up and running so 
we have until then to figure out what we want to do with it.

Cheers,
MS


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]