[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:41:03 +0200 |
On 26 avr. 2012, at 11:43, James wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On 26 April 2012 08:51, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 26 April 2012 07:55, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, right now we have nobody running the automated tests to
>>>>> check that new patches are ok. So there will be no patches
>>>>> accepted to lilypond.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a meeting in mid-May w/ the University of Paris VIII. They're
>>>> donating a computer to LilyPond and I'll set patchy up on it.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> One thing I'm gonna try to do on that machine is have each index.html
>> generated by a regtest comparison (along with the log/png/jpg/etc files)
>> upload to a folder on mikesolomon.org. These can hang out indefinitely and
>> an automatic e-mail can be sent to the list w/ an alert that patchset X is
>> up for viewing on site Y.
>
> Still requires 'someone' to 'do' something and then say 'LGTM' and I
> don't know what the feed back has been with regard to the
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/grand-regression-test-checking.html
>
> is this just not the same thing in essence?
>
>
> What about GUB?
>
> Might that be a (more) worthwhile 'project' for a machine like this?
>
It's not not possible - it's not what I had in mind, but it sounds like a good
idea.
I'll likely be spending a few days in July getting this thing up and running so
we have until then to figure out what we want to do with it.
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), (continued)
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Graham Percival, 2012/04/25
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/25
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Graham Percival, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), address@hidden, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), James, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), address@hidden, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), David Kastrup, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), James, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046),
address@hidden <=
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Phil Holmes, 2012/04/27
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), James, 2012/04/27
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Phil Holmes, 2012/04/27
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/28
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Graham Percival, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), David Kastrup, 2012/04/26
Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), milimetr88, 2012/04/25
Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), tdanielsmusic, 2012/04/25
Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), graham, 2012/04/27