[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:48:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue 24 Jul 2018 at 18:50:27 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote:
> Is it possible that the problem is due to an old fontconfig version
> used by LilyPond? my Debian package is 2.13.0, the LilyPond
> directory suggests a version 1.9.2 (is that possible?).
Can you be a bit more specific about what versioning you mean.
Here (Debian stretch):
david 270584 Jun 24 07:12
/home/david/lilypond-2.19.82-1/lilypond/usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.9.2
root 252968 Aug 24 2016 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfontconfig.so.1.8.0
ii fontconfig 2.11.0-6.7+b1 amd64 generic font configuration library - support
binaries
ii libfontconfig1:amd64 2.11.0-6.7+b1 amd64 generic font configuration library
- runtime
It seems as if you're comparing package versions with library versions.
Cheers,
David.
Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/19
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/24
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output,
David Wright <=
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/24
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Federico Bruni, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Federico Bruni, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25