Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis

[Timothy Brownawell]

On 05/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:

> * #17878: Usability: too easy to accidentally fork after
>    merge or disapprove
>    ->  branch is net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.17878-tbrownaw
>    ->  @Tim: is this done?

It needs a test using the --update option, which I'll get to either in 
the morning or after work tomorrow. I suppose I should also put a note 
in NEWS about setting your get_default_command_options() if you want to 
always have that behavior.

> * #16895: Better error reporting in permission-denied scenarios
>    ->  @Tim: Do you think of anything in particular ("but not a very
>    good one")? Maybe this is worth a tiny patch...
>    ->  points: 1 to Tim

I think it's improved since that post.

> Other than that I'm quite happy with the results. We've closed many bugs
> and I think we should do that again some time in the future to bring
> down the bug count even more.

Maybe try for every 6 months or so? If it's too often we'd probably get 
lower participation on any particular date, which wouldn't work at all 
at our size.

--
Timothy

Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net