Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis

[Thomas Keller]

Am 10.05.2010 05:23, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
> On 05/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
> 
>> * #17878: Usability: too easy to accidentally fork after
>>    merge or disapprove
>>    ->  branch is net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.17878-tbrownaw
>>    ->  @Tim: is this done?
> 
> It needs a test using the --update option, which I'll get to either in
> the morning or after work tomorrow. I suppose I should also put a note
> in NEWS about setting your get_default_command_options() if you want to
> always have that behavior.

Ok, cool.

>> * #16895: Better error reporting in permission-denied scenarios
>>    ->  @Tim: Do you think of anything in particular ("but not a very
>>    good one")? Maybe this is worth a tiny patch...
>>    ->  points: 1 to Tim
> 
> I think it's improved since that post.

Ah right, I totally oversaw the date of your comment... ;)

>> Other than that I'm quite happy with the results. We've closed many bugs
>> and I think we should do that again some time in the future to bring
>> down the bug count even more.
> 
> Maybe try for every 6 months or so? If it's too often we'd probably get
> lower participation on any particular date, which wouldn't work at all
> at our size.

Lets try to do that every two or three months - I think six months are
way too much down the road. I want to keep the project active and
healthy with this, and as Derek noted, it should motivate all of us a
lot to work together in a small sprint. A shorter time span also means
that if one person cannot attend for timing reasons, he / she doesn't
have to wait another six months until he / she gets the chance again :)

Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature