Re: [GNU/consensus] Map of Projects / Sessions at 30C3

[Andreas Kuckartz]

carlo von lynX:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:28:38PM -0300, hellekin wrote:
>> *** We need to distinguish two vectors in our working group.
>>
>> One is the hardcore P2P "next generation" that focuses on GNUnet and
>> peer-to-peer solutions ; and the other is the "transitional" that
>> focuses on how to go from here to there, including contemplating
>> alternate paths, such as patching hopeless protocols, or seeking to
>> reform the existing nightmarish hell of a reality.
>
> No, we don't need to make that distinction. At the last meeting
> there was a clear majority who only wants to get something solid
> off the ground and doesn't care for legacy patchwork.

Was there a vote on that? What does clear majority mean (60% of the
participants? participants representing 90% of users?) ?

Can you name those projects represented in that meeting which do not
care about improving the situation for users of what you call
"legacy"-software and -standards ?

Cheers,
Andreas