Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Wed Dec 31 2003 17:55:12 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• December 31, 2003
  • Re: %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], with an enigmatic, Haywood Kurt, 17:55
  • Re: %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], then! youre going, Booker, 06:51
  • Re: SUBDIR_OBJECTS option, jling, 01:55
• December 30, 2003
  • Re: VO, they calmed varenukha, Gale Coon, 22:21
  • Re: CQ, in our country, Meredith, 22:19
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:02
  • Re: mailing list archives, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 21:01
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 20:42
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 20:41
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 18:09
  • Re: mailing list archives (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects), Thomas Dickey, 18:01
  • mailing list archives (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:48
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 16:33
  • Re: SUBDIR_OBJECTS option, Tom Tromey, 15:02
  • Re: %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], furious applause shook, Link, 04:58
  • International Conference- Water India 4- Water Resources Development, February 3- 4, 2004; New Delhi, INDIA, IndiaCore, 02:54
  • SUBDIR_OBJECTS option, jling, 00:43
• December 29, 2003
  • Re: %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], on the blanket, Douglas Brad, 10:32
  • address@hidden Savings of over 70% on Ultram, Mallory Newman, 07:25
• December 28, 2003
  • Re: beckoned him onstage yws jbeihcyfcuggh, Fred Armstrong, 21:35
  • address@hidden Save over 80% on New official USA FDA approved medications, Fredrick Wang, 09:56
  • This patch will change your member, Scotty Stone, 07:06
• December 27, 2003
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 22:27
  • smash your girls coochie, Colleen Gregory, 22:17
  • Most potent HGH ever, Rosalinda Payne, 14:18
  • Re: IRIJUXZ, just as timofei, William, 07:40
  • address@hidden, Yesenia Pacheco, 06:18
  • Re: HOEIDGY, here the front, Malinda, 05:13
• December 26, 2003
  • Need some HGH?, Lourdes Pittman, 20:44
  • PRAISE ALLAH, THE MOST BENEVOLENT., All Stars Finance & Securities, 07:51
  • Re: CF, involuntarily moved apart;, Jenkins Jerrod, 07:29
• December 25, 2003
  • Re:Ecommercessolutions jmr hbyv, Tamara Wolfe, 09:21
  • Improve Your Health, Rosalyn Duarte, 05:37
  • Re: can keep ivan ezijacepmvchycw, Mable Glover, 04:12
• December 24, 2003
  • Re: WAPTUJ, moment later natasha, Edith Smart, 17:18
  • Re: Usage, Tom Tromey, 16:00
  • Re: Can this be automade?, David Wolfe, 13:59
  • Can this be automade?, Martijn Ras, 11:03
  • Re:$3/month banner freeehosting sb xdrdkbkmhzl, Zachariah Osborn, 08:56
  • Usage, John Darrington, 05:51
• December 23, 2003
  • (no subject), secu-imall, 23:44
  • RE: Automake/Autoconf and Doxygen, Oren Ben-Kiki, 16:25
  • Re: include_HEADERS and all-am, jling, 15:30
  • Contact me on January 2004, ramatmails, 13:04
  • Re: include_HEADERS and all-am, Andreas Schwab, 08:43
  • Re: aclocal-1.8/m4_include behaving oddly, Andreas Schwab, 08:33
  • Re: aclocal-1.8/m4_include behaving oddly, Phil Edwards, 03:41
  • Automake, mojgan jafari, 02:51
• December 22, 2003
  • include_HEADERS and all-am, jling, 23:04
  • Re: vpath builds and include paths, jling, 22:57
  • Re: autom4te.cache and Automake 1.8, Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 22:40
  • Re: autom4te.cache and Automake 1.8, Andreas Schwab, 22:01
  • autom4te.cache and Automake 1.8, Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 18:12
  • Re: vpath builds and include paths, Guido Draheim, 11:47
  • Re: vpath builds and include paths, Bob Friesenhahn, 11:06
  • Re: aclocal-1.8/m4_include behaving oddly, Andreas Schwab, 10:20
  • Re: vpath builds and include paths, Ralf Corsepius, 03:31
  • vpath builds and include paths, jling, 01:58
• December 21, 2003
  • Caml Support for Automake, Tom Murray, 23:20
  • CasinoClub Newsletter, Casinoclub Bonus, 15:55
  • No Pills or Pumps Enlarge now, Sasha Carver, 01:02
• December 20, 2003
  • hello, gillfernadez, 13:42
  • AWARD WINNING FINAL NOTIFICATION., lottointerprom, 09:34
  • aclocal-1.8/m4_include behaving oddly, Phil Edwards, 05:37
• December 19, 2003
  • Re: non recursive includes proof of concept #2, Robert Collins, 23:53
  • Re: HEAD test suite - 6 failures., Robert Collins, 23:09
  • Re: HEAD test suite - 6 failures., Robert Collins, 18:10
  • Re: HEAD test suite - 6 failures., Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:54
  • Re: non recursive includes proof of concept #2, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:43
  • ChessBrain: World Record!, The ChessBrain Network, 09:16
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 01:41
  • damassus keass, Alton Adair, 00:18
• December 18, 2003
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 22:34
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 14:28
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 11:09
  • new fda approved cialis, Carla Hannah, 10:34
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 09:51
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 09:44
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Jim Meyering, 06:42
  • Re: HEAD test suite - 6 failures., Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:03
• December 17, 2003
  • BUSINESS ASSISTANCE., MR . GEORGE HARRIS, 15:53
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Andreas Schwab, 13:11
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Andreas Schwab, 13:10
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Gary V. Vaughan, 12:00
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Norman Gray, 11:19
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 11:03
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 10:30
  • HEAD test suite - 6 failures., Robert Collins, 07:01
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Lars Hecking, 06:57
  • non-recursive via includes, Robert Collins, 06:43
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:51
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:02
• December 16, 2003
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 21:55
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 21:53
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 19:24
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 19:19
  • cialis is the new drug, Vito Butcher, 18:57
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:55
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:45
  • Autoconf 2.59 available from ftp.gnu.org, Paul Eggert, 17:33
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 17:09
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 16:55
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 16:42
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 16:42
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 16:37
  • Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 13:30
  • automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 13:03
• December 15, 2003
  • .cpp to .c, Bob Lockie, 22:09
  • grouping libraries, Marty Leisner, 18:25
  • Re: comment sources, Daniel Reed, 11:10
  • Re: distcheck failure: version.texi, Ralf Wildenhues, 06:34
  • comment sources, Bob Lockie, 02:57
• December 14, 2003
  • Re: moving po/Makefile.in.in to automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:05
  • automake-1.8 and texinfo, Harlan Stenn, 02:31
• December 13, 2003
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:07
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Andreas Schwab, 14:33
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Andreas Schwab, 13:46
  • Re: aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:32
  • fortran FC patch, Michael R Nolta, 02:18
• December 12, 2003
  • fda approved cialis, Thomas Evans, 23:52
  • change from manual config.h.in to autoheadered, Bob Lockie, 21:37
  • aclocal 1.8 no longer loads overridden macros, Andreas Schwab, 18:10
• December 11, 2003
  • Re: Emulating GNU Make conditionals, or: Is there a nice way to automatically set CFLAGS when make is run?, Tom Tromey, 21:56
  • Re: making convenience libraries without libtool, Daniel Reed, 14:26
  • Re: making convenience libraries without libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 12:14
  • making convenience libraries without libtool, Marty Leisner, 12:03
  • Building Fortran 77 libtool modules, Schleicher Ralph (LLI), 09:14
• December 10, 2003
  • Re: automake distclean bug?, Bob Friesenhahn, 19:12
  • GNU Automake 1.8 released, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:37
  • Re: Emulating GNU Make conditionals, or: Is there a nice way to automatically set CFLAGS when make is run?, Bob Friesenhahn, 12:56
  • Re: Emulating GNU Make conditionals, or: Is there a nice way to automatically set CFLAGS when make is run?, Bob Friesenhahn, 12:40
  • Re: Emulating GNU Make conditionals, or: Is there a nice way to automatically set CFLAGS when make is run?, Dalibor Topic, 12:18
  • We still have places left., Robert, 11:23
  • Re: [MAD SCIENCE EXPERIMENT]: Replace some libtool functionality with handcoded C, Alexandre Oliva, 11:13
  • Emulating GNU Make conditionals, or: Is there a nice way to automatically set CFLAGS when make is run?, Dalibor Topic, 09:42
  • Re: automake distclean bug?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 03:23
  • Re: Current versions of automake and autoconf, Akim Demaille, 01:21
  • automake distclean bug?, Bob Friesenhahn, 00:48
• December 09, 2003
  • Re: Help Requests, Bob Friesenhahn, 22:43
  • Re: Help Requests, David Wolfe, 22:34
  • Re: Help Requests, dc, 18:34
  • Re: distcheck failure: version.texi, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:36
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Robert Collins, 17:11
  • Re: Newbie Request for Help (make dist problem), J. Scott Amort, 16:50
  • Re: Help Requests, J. Scott Amort, 16:25
  • Re: C programs using C++ libraries, Billy Biggs, 16:20
  • Re: C programs using C++ libraries, Bob Friesenhahn, 16:10
  • C programs using C++ libraries, Billy Biggs, 15:32
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 14:59
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Tom Tromey, 14:25
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Tom Tromey, 14:19
  • Re: [MAD SCIENCE EXPERIMENT]: Replace some libtool functionality with handcoded C, Tom Tromey, 14:02
  • Re: Help Requests, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 14:02
  • Re: SUBDIRs and slashes, Tom Tromey, 13:49
  • Re: Newbie Request for Help (make dist problem), Tom Tromey, 13:40
  • Re: automake and i18n, Bruno Haible, 07:40
  • Re: moving po/Makefile.in.in to automake, Bruno Haible, 07:13
  • distcheck failure: version.texi, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:08
  • Re: automake and i18n, Akim Demaille, 05:55
  • Help Requests, J. Scott Amort, 02:10
• December 08, 2003
  • Re: automake and i18n, Guido Flohr, 14:55
  • Re: automake and i18n, Akim Demaille, 10:30
• December 07, 2003
  • Re: VPATH and Relative vs. Absolute pathnames, John Darrington, 22:06
  • blessed in the name of the Lord., maryojones, 20:27
  • Re: VPATH and Relative vs. Absolute pathnames, Bob Friesenhahn, 11:26
  • VPATH and Relative vs. Absolute pathnames, John Darrington, 07:16
• December 06, 2003
  • fda approved cialis, Autoconf, Austin Allison, 22:51
• December 05, 2003
  • Authors! Reach 400 Senior Editors at Royalty-Paying Publishers!, Bookman Publishing, 21:24
  • Strictly Personal ( Please Help me because of God), pmaryotete, 09:09
  • Newbie Request for Help (make dist problem), J. Scott Amort, 01:48
• December 04, 2003
  • Re: Desired feature, Eric Siegerman, 18:26
  • Re: Desired feature, Bruce Korb, 13:16
  • Re: Desired feature, Gary V. Vaughan, 12:55
  • Re: Desired feature, Bob Friesenhahn, 12:07
  • Re: [MAD SCIENCE EXPERIMENT]: Replace some libtool functionalitywith handcoded C, Bruce Korb, 11:13
  • Re: [MAD SCIENCE EXPERIMENT]: Replace some libtool functionality with handcoded C, Mohan Embar, 09:25
  • automake and i18n, Guido Flohr, 08:15
  • Re: Desired feature, Gary V. Vaughan, 07:47
  • Re: Desired feature, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:47
  • Re: Desired feature, Gary V. Vaughan, 04:56
  • Re: [MAD SCIENCE EXPERIMENT]: Replace some libtool functionality with handcoded C, Alexandre Oliva, 02:47
• December 03, 2003
  • Re: Status of non-recursive automake, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:59
  • Re: Status of non-recursive automake, John Darrington, 21:03
  • Desired feature, Bob Friesenhahn, 15:32
  • Last patch I'd like to go in 2.60, Paolo Bonzini, 06:43
  • Sending Resume, Engineer - Mgr, 01:04
• December 02, 2003
  • Re: Status of non-recursive automake, John Darrington, 23:54
  • Re: Status of non-recursive automake, Bob Friesenhahn, 22:08
  • Re: Automake 1.7h uploaded (fourth beta for Automake 1.8), Pavel Roskin, 20:05
  • it works better, Billie T. Eldridge, 19:35
  • Status of non-recursive automake, John Darrington, 19:24
  • Automake 1.7h uploaded (fourth beta for Automake 1.8), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:55
  • Re: failure building HEAD, Robert Collins, 17:34
  • Deciding wether dynamic or static, JRBCAST, 12:43
  • Re: failure building HEAD, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:06
  • playing with recursive libtool static archives, Marty Leisner, 01:54
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 00:06
• December 01, 2003
  • Re: non recursive includes proof of concept #2, Jirka Hanika, 23:18
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Robert Collins, 20:37
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Robert Collins, 16:39
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 16:11
  • Re: SUBDIRs and slashes, Ralf Corsepius, 09:48
  • oops, regression - updated proof of concept - #2a, Robert Collins, 07:51
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Robert Collins, 05:13
  • Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue, Robert Collins, 05:10
  • FINANCIAL Independence Is Calling You...jiro, Young Irvin, 05:07
  • Re: failure building HEAD, Robert Collins, 05:04
  • non recursive includes proof of concept #2, Robert Collins, 05:00
  • Re: SUBDIRs and slashes, Joerg Faschingbauer, 04:49
  • Re: failure building HEAD, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 03:11

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc