Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Wed Apr 30 2003 22:11:15 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• April 30, 2003
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs, 22:11
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs, 22:04
  • Getting "undefined reference" errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, cs, 20:48
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Roger Leigh, 17:07
  • Re: confirm 424f5c40ace0ae5e5f07352cb9445365aac0a6de, Mariusz Pekala, 15:32
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Eric Siegerman, 13:38
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Eric Siegerman, 13:36
  • Re: different name for debug and release library/program, Guido Draheim, 12:20
  • replacement function library for autoconf checks, Mr E_T, 09:45
  • creating 1 library from all noinst libraries in subdirs, Bob Rossi, 08:32
  • autoconf automake and aclocal, Lol Durst, 05:54
  • different name for debug and release library/program, Juraj Hercek, 05:33
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille, 02:28
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs, 00:25
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Bob Proulx, 00:17
• April 29, 2003
  • I can't set up Makefile.am for data directory & avoid "No rule to make target `all'."..., cs, 21:46
  • INSTALL_DATA and modes, Harlan Stenn, 20:50
  • Re: libraries within libraries, Steve M. Robbins, 16:20
  • Re: libraries within libraries, Bob Rossi, 15:18
  • libraries within libraries, Marco Correia, 15:11
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs, 14:47
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Roger Leigh, 14:00
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs, 12:50
  • Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, cs, 12:48
  • Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADDinstead of LDADD?, Steve M. Robbins, 08:22
  • Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, Dale E Martin, 07:40
  • Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, William S Fulton, 03:36
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Bob Proulx, 00:00
• April 28, 2003
  • Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, Bob Proulx, 23:56
  • missing: a patch, Bruce Korb, 20:55
  • Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, cs, 20:04
  • OK to run script in Makefile.am??.. like `gtk-config ...--libs` to get params for LDADD?, cs, 19:37
  • What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs, 19:08
  • a small bug recognizing ##, Mr E_T, 09:55
  • automake -a behavior, Sander Niemeijer, 08:11
  • Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, Sander Niemeijer, 06:19
  • Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, William S Fulton, 05:23
  • Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, Sander Niemeijer, 04:55
• April 27, 2003
  • Problem with automake 1.7.2, Christoph Egger, 16:28
• April 26, 2003
  • Re: acinclude.m4 required everywhere, Patrick Welche, 21:13
  • Re: acinclude.m4 required everywhere, Raja R Harinath, 20:16
  • Re: acinclude.m4 required everywhere, Raja R Harinath, 19:58
  • acinclude.m4 required everywhere, Patrick Welche, 19:38
  • copperation urgente, Beatrice Eila Savimbi, 13:35
  • creating generic am files to be auto included by automake, Mr E_T, 10:29
• April 25, 2003
  • Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, Al, 18:59
  • Re: automake and libtool error, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:11
  • Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:07
  • Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:34
  • Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Akim Demaille, 10:51
  • libtool-1.5 causes malfunctioning of 'aclocal', Bruno Haible, 10:45
  • creating generic am files to be auto included by automake, Mr E_T, 09:08
  • merging headers, Marco Correia, 05:56
  • Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Dr. David Kirkby, 05:24
• April 24, 2003
  • Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Harlan Stenn, 22:12
  • Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Dr. David Kirkby, 22:06
  • tarball checksum/signature targets?, Harlan Stenn, 19:34
  • Davetlimizsiniz..., Burcu, 03:39
• April 23, 2003
  • Automake 1.7.4 released, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:38
  • automake and libtool error, Paul F. Kunz, 13:34
  • LEX/YACC definitions header, Alan Larkin, 10:07
  • Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Akim Demaille, 05:58
  • WAPP contacting you, wapp, 01:34
• April 22, 2003
  • Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Eric Siegerman, 21:38
  • Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Karl Berry, 19:29
  • Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Bob Rossi, 16:08
  • Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:37
  • Re: Makefile.am for m4, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:33
  • Re: Can I put a message after tests are run?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:22
  • Re: Speeding up config and make, Bruce Korb, 12:07
  • Re: is LDADD line the place to put .a convenience libraries AS WELL AS -l switches?? like -lm??? how works?, Dale E Martin, 09:28
  • Re: Speeding up config and make, Robert Boehne, 01:57
  • Re: Speeding up config and make, Bob Proulx, 01:32
• April 21, 2003
  • Any difference between LDADD = ... and myprogram_LDADD = ... ???, cs, 20:16
  • is LDADD line the place to put .a convenience libraries AS WELL AS -l switches?? like -lm??? how works?, cs, 20:10
  • Re: Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?, cs, 18:09
  • Re: Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?, Guido Draheim, 17:36
  • Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?, cs, 16:54
  • Speeding up config and make, Bruce Korb, 14:12
  • Delivery Status Notification (Failure), postmaster, 01:13
  • Delivery Status Notification (Failure), postmaster, 00:46
• April 20, 2003
  • 5-Year Anniversary Invitation - RSVP!!!, Success Connection, 23:12
  • Delivery Status Notification (Failure), postmaster, 22:23
  • Delivery Status Notification (Failure), postmaster, 22:01
  • Delivery Status Notification (Failure), postmaster, 21:28
  • Re: Do nested subdirs of source always require building temporary libraries you don't install?..., cs, 18:40
  • Re: Do nested subdirs of source always require building temporary libraries you don't install?..., Dale E Martin, 14:15
  • Should be called "GNU Build System" or Autotools? Which is preferred/better/official?, cs, 11:21
  • Do nested subdirs of source always require building temporary libraries you don't install?..., cs, 04:07
  • xyz_SOURCES = ... <--- What does xyz equal if many levels of source directories? (Same xyz for *many* dirs?), cs, 02:26
  • new sweater styles publish-011, lolita, 00:03
• April 19, 2003
  • Can I put a message after tests are run?, Dr. David Kirkby, 20:44
  • on use of SUBDIR vs. just adding path to _SOURCES variable..., cs, 18:23
  • CVS version is not less verbose, William S Fulton, 18:21
  • Re: Automake 1.7.3b uploaded (beta for 1.7.4), Richard Dawe, 08:05
  • Re: [BUG] config.status: error on rebuild Makefile, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:27
  • Makefile.am for m4, John Poltorak, 05:00
  • Re: make distcheck fails with 'does not support --help', Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:53
• April 18, 2003
  • Re: make distcheck fails with 'does not support --help', Dr. David Kirkby, 19:39
  • Re: make distcheck fails with 'does not support --help', Thien-Thi Nguyen, 19:23
  • Re: Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 19:02
  • Re: Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, Thomas Dickey, 18:55
  • Re: Turning off use of Libtool, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:49
  • Re: Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:41
  • make distcheck fails with 'does not support --help', Dr. David Kirkby, 18:24
  • Re: Environment Configuration for Test Execution, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:19
  • Automake 1.7.3b uploaded (beta for 1.7.4), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:42
  • Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby, 17:20
  • Re: AM_CPPFLAGS vs. [lib]_CPPFLAGS, William S Fulton, 16:38
  • Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby, 11:37
  • Re: How handle subdirectories with own Autotools stuff already??..., Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 10:55
  • Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if noportability concerns???, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 09:37
  • Re: How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby, 08:30
  • Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Tim Van Holder, 07:59
  • Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Earnie Boyd, 07:04
  • Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby, 06:06
  • Re: How do a copy a file?, Eric Siegerman, 04:52
  • Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Robert Collins, 01:07
  • Re: How do a copy a file?, Bob Proulx, 00:48
• April 17, 2003
  • Re: How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby, 23:18
  • Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby, 22:25
  • Re: How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby, 21:06
  • Re: *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac's for complex trees of source code?, Eric Siegerman, 20:32
  • Re: *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac'sforcomplex trees of source code?, Eric Siegerman, 20:23
  • Re: How do a copy a file?, Eric Siegerman, 20:14
  • [BUG] config.status: error on rebuild Makefile [2], zaufi, 19:44
  • [BUG] config.status: error on rebuild Makefile, zaufi, 19:36
  • How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby, 19:09
  • Delivery Status Notification (Failure), postmaster, 19:04
  • Turning off use of Libtool, William S Fulton, 18:59
  • Delivery Status Notification (Failure), postmaster, 18:47
  • Re: *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac'sforcomplex trees of source code?, Richard Dawe, 18:13
  • Re: Why manual says *don't* add config.h to _SOURCES definition!?!, Richard Dawe, 18:04
  • *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac's for complex trees of source code?, cs, 17:52
  • Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, cs, 17:37
  • How handle subdirectories with own Autotools stuff already??..., cs, 17:13
  • Why manual says *don't* add config.h to _SOURCES definition!?!, cs, 17:06
  • Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Dale E Martin, 09:58
  • Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if noportability concerns???, Dr. David Kirkby, 09:42
  • Re: Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules PART2, Sander Niemeijer, 08:13
  • Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, Earnie Boyd, 07:38
  • Re: Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules PART2, Juraj Hercek, 06:04
  • Re: Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules, Sander Niemeijer, 05:04
  • Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules, Juraj Hercek, 02:43
  • Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, Stephen Torri, 00:23
• April 16, 2003
  • Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, cs, 23:33
  • Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Nic Ferrier, 21:32
  • Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, Bob Proulx, 21:23
  • Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Bob Proulx, 21:17
  • Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, cs, 19:57
  • Environment Configuration for Test Execution, Drummonds, Scott B, 17:17
  • Re: Any tips for how do Makefile.am if LOTS of source files???, Dr. David Kirkby, 16:53
  • Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Guido Draheim, 16:02
  • Re: Any tips for how do Makefile.am if LOTS of source files???, Guido Draheim, 15:50
  • Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, cs, 15:24
  • Any tips for how do Makefile.am if LOTS of source files???, cs, 15:22
  • Re: Objective C on Mac OS X, Martin Wagner, 05:16
  • Re: Can I select a different compiler ??, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 05:06
  • Re: Libtool libraries in checks?, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 04:38
  • Fwd: Re: automake questions, Martin Wagner, 04:36
  • Re: automake, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 04:28
  • Fwd: automake questions, Martin Wagner, 04:28
• April 15, 2003
  • Re: Objective C on Mac OS X, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 19:03
  • Can I select a different compiler ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 15:19
  • GNU Libtool 1.5 released, Robert Boehne, 03:21
  • GNU Libtool 1.4f available for testing, Robert Boehne, 02:52
• April 14, 2003
  • Re: Compile C code with C++ compiler, Philipp Thomas, 11:28
  • Re: Objective C on Mac OS X, Martin Wagner, 06:24
  • Re: Objective C on Mac OS X, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:52
  • Objective C on Mac OS X, Martin Wagner, 03:49
• April 13, 2003
  • Re: AM_CPPFLAGS vs. [lib]_CPPFLAGS, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:15
  • AM_CPPFLAGS vs. [lib]_CPPFLAGS, Bill Moseley, 16:49
  • Re: simple java compilation, Nic Ferrier, 14:13
  • Re: simple java compilation, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:38
• April 12, 2003
  • Re: How do I pass an argument to a test???, Dr. David Kirkby, 20:30
  • Re: How do I pass an argument to a test???, Bruce Korb, 19:57
  • How do I pass an argument to a test???, Dr. David Kirkby, 19:38
  • 未承諾広告※無料プレゼント, 無料プレゼント, 00:33
• April 11, 2003
  • April 2003: Manhattan Office Space Update, Stephen Sunderland, 21:18
  • Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Raja R Harinath, 17:33
  • Re: automake/libtool interoperability problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:47
  • Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:43
  • Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:43
  • Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Raja R Harinath, 14:18
  • Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Raja R Harinath, 14:07
  • Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Eric Siegerman, 12:31
  • automake/libtool interoperability problem, Lars Hecking, 05:29
  • Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 02:47
• April 10, 2003
  • Conference Newsletter, Conference News, 19:49
  • Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Richard Dawe, 19:11
  • Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Richard Dawe, 19:06
  • Re: Have I got an installation problem?????, Ralf Corsepius, 17:12
  • Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:50
  • Re: simple java compilation, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:27
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:18
  • Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:07
  • Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Lorenzo Bettini, 14:20
  • Re: Have I got an installation problem?????, Eric Siegerman, 13:54
  • mkdepend, Bruzzone Mirko, 05:54
  • Libtool libraries in checks?, Magnus Therning, 05:37
  • mkdepend, Bruzzone Mirko, 04:22
  • Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 04:18
  • mkdepend, Bruzzone Mirko, 04:13
• April 09, 2003
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:07
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille, 14:55
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:39
  • Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Lorenzo Bettini, 14:22
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Raja R Harinath, 11:37
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille, 11:14
  • Re: Compile C code with C++ compiler, Earnie Boyd, 07:47
  • Re: Can I peforma conditional tests???, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 07:37
  • Re: Compile C code with C++ compiler, Sebastian Huber, 07:29
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille, 03:22
  • Re: Compile C code with C++ compiler, Ralf Corsepius, 00:44
  • Re: Have I got an installation problem?????, Ralf Corsepius, 00:41
• April 08, 2003
  • Re: multiple definition of e.g., bin_PROGRAMS, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:43
  • Have I got an installation problem?????, Dr. David Kirkby, 16:36
  • Re: /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Andreas Schwab, 15:56
  • Re: /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Dr. David Kirkby, 15:36
  • Compile C code with C++ compiler, Sebastian Huber, 14:12
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Raja R Harinath, 13:58
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Bob Proulx, 13:06
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille, 12:23
  • Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille, 12:13
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Bill Moseley, 09:12
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Earnie Boyd, 08:05
  • profesores de nuevas tecnologias, Daniel Belzer, 07:39
  • Re: /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Andreas Schwab, 04:47
  • kjk, Hisense, 02:15
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Eric Siegerman, 01:24
• April 07, 2003
  • /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Dr. David Kirkby, 20:16
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Dr. David Kirkby, 19:06
  • simple java compilation, Nic Ferrier, 18:59
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:25
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:02
  • Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:22
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Steve M. Robbins, 12:59
  • Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Bob Proulx, 12:52
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Bill Moseley, 12:13
  • Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Dr. David Kirkby, 04:33
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Bob Proulx, 03:44
  • Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Akim Demaille, 03:34
• April 06, 2003
  • Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:50
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Bill Moseley, 17:29
  • Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:13
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:17
  • Re: Objects in multiple directories, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:59
  • Re: make sorts libraries at link stage, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:52
  • Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:33
  • Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:32
  • Re: `make install' and $(BUILT_SOURCES), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:27
• April 05, 2003
  • Can I peforma conditional tests???, Dr. David Kirkby, 13:04
• April 04, 2003
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Raja R Harinath, 20:29
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Bill Moseley, 19:48
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Raja R Harinath, 19:23
  • Re: Removing dependencies, Raja R Harinath, 19:18
  • Removing dependencies, Bill Moseley, 18:48
  • Re: Optimisation across source files., Braden McDaniel, 16:44
  • Optimisation across source files., Dr. David Kirkby, 15:47
  • Re: a general question about config.h files, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 06:40
• April 03, 2003
  • Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Jonah Graham, 09:04
• April 02, 2003
  • Re: Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Bob Proulx, 15:09
  • Re: a general question about config.h files, Dale E Martin, 13:58
  • Re: Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Paul Brook, 13:11
  • Re: Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 11:17
  • Re: a general question about config.h files, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 10:28
  • Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Richard Dawe, 05:34
  • Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Bob Proulx, 04:35
  • multiple definition of e.g., bin_PROGRAMS, Jim Meyering, 04:03
  • English - Spanish Translation Services, LXTrans - Translation Services, 00:54
• April 01, 2003
  • Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Jonah Graham, 19:20
  • Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Richard Dawe, 12:48
  • example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Jonah Graham, 11:54

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc